'/api/v1/accounts/{accountId}/agents' transaction execution time desynchronization detected between builds - Build_v1 has zero ET value.
This can be possible when execution in one of the builds is too fast or too slow. Does require further investigation.

'/auth/sign_in' transaction with weight '54.47%' has the highest value of ET in the group '408.7'.
This means that this transaction can be viewed as a bottleneck factor.

'host/' transaction with weight '8.29%' has the lowest value of ET in the group '62.22'.
This means that this transaction can be viewed as the most lightweight transaction in the group.

The special notice can be given to the '656.86%' of the dispersion between maximum and minimum ET values.
Which indicates a lack of homogeneity in the transaction group.

'host/' transaction with weight '8.29%' has the highest value of difference in the group '+24.44%'.
This means that this transaction can be viewed as a target for improvement.

'/auth/validate_token' transaction with weight '14.47%' has the lowest value of difference in the group '-33.793%'.

The special notice can be given to the absolute value '58.23%' of dispersion between maximum and minimum difference values.
Such dispersion suggests that transaction performance improvements and deteriorations, that were made directly or indirectly, did make related system part(s) more unstable which require further investigation.

'/api/v1/accounts/{accountId}/labels' transaction with weight '21.93%' has the highest value of ET in the group '594.36'.
This means that this transaction can be viewed as a bottleneck factor.

'/brand-assets/logo-small.png' transaction with weight '7.25%' has the lowest value of ET in the group '196.56'.
This means that this transaction can be viewed as the most lightweight transaction in the group.

The special notice can be given to the '302.38%' of the dispersion between maximum and minimum ET values.
Which indicates a lack of homogeneity in the transaction group.

'/api/v1/accounts/{accountId}/labels' transaction with weight '21.93%' has the highest value of difference in the group '+109.282%'.
This means that this transaction can be viewed as a target for improvement.

'/api/v1/accounts/{accountId}/' transaction with weight '11.92%' has the lowest value of difference in the group '-8.261%'.

The special notice can be given to the absolute value '117.54%' of dispersion between maximum and minimum difference values.
Such dispersion suggests that transaction performance improvements and deteriorations, that were made directly or indirectly, did make related system part(s) more unstable which require further investigation.

'toggle_status resolved' transaction with weight '39.93%' has the highest value of ET in the group '1063.019'.
This means that this transaction can be viewed as a bottleneck factor.

'/api/v1/accounts/{accountId}/conversations/meta?status=open&assignee_type=me' transaction with weight '3.19%' has the lowest value of ET in the group '84.926'.
This means that this transaction can be viewed as the most lightweight transaction in the group.

The special notice can be given to the '1251.70%' of the dispersion between maximum and minimum ET values.
Which indicates a lack of homogeneity in the transaction group.

'toggle_status resolved' transaction with weight '39.93%' has the highest value of difference in the group '+96.508%'.
This means that this transaction can be viewed as a target for improvement.

'check conversation status = resolved' transaction with weight '5.10%' has the lowest value of difference in the group '-14.565%'.

The special notice can be given to the absolute value '111.07%' of dispersion between maximum and minimum difference values.
Such dispersion suggests that transaction performance improvements and deteriorations, that were made directly or indirectly, did make related system part(s) more unstable which require further investigation.

'toggle_status resolved' transaction with weight '35.99%' has the highest value of ET in the group '1136.003'.
This means that this transaction can be viewed as a bottleneck factor.

'/api/v1/accounts/{accountId}/custom_attribute_definitions?filter=all' transaction with weight '3.33%' has the lowest value of ET in the group '105.019'.
This means that this transaction can be viewed as the most lightweight transaction in the group.

The special notice can be given to the '1081.71%' of the dispersion between maximum and minimum ET values.
Which indicates a lack of homogeneity in the transaction group.

'/api/v1/accounts/{accountId}/conversations/{conv_id}/labels' transaction with weight '5.25%' has the highest value of difference in the group '+94.848%'.
This means that this transaction can be viewed as a target for improvement.

'update_last_seen' transaction with weight '4.57%' has the lowest value of difference in the group '-63.199%'.

The special notice can be given to the absolute value '158.05%' of dispersion between maximum and minimum difference values.
Such dispersion suggests that transaction performance improvements and deteriorations, that were made directly or indirectly, did make related system part(s) more unstable which require further investigation.

'Agent - Reply msg 1' transaction with weight '22.50%' has the highest value of ET in the group '255.358'.
This means that this transaction can be viewed as a bottleneck factor.

'Agent - Reply msg 5' transaction with weight '11.76%' has the lowest value of ET in the group '133.456'.
This means that this transaction can be viewed as the most lightweight transaction in the group.

The special notice can be given to the '191.34%' of the dispersion between maximum and minimum ET values.
Which indicates a lack of homogeneity in the transaction group.

'Agent - Welcome msg' transaction with weight '21.26%' has the highest value of difference in the group '+114.6%'.
This means that this transaction can be viewed as a target for improvement.

'Agent - Reply msg 4' transaction with weight '14.84%' has the lowest value of difference in the group '+12.676%'.
The '+' character indicates an increase in ET, which is a negative factor. This increase was observed in transaction with the lowest difference within the transaction group, suggesting a negative overall impact on the group.

The special notice can be given to the absolute value '101.92%' of dispersion between maximum and minimum difference values.
Such dispersion suggests that transaction performance improvements and deteriorations, that were made directly or indirectly, did make related system part(s) more unstable which require further investigation.

'Bot - Agent request msg' transaction with weight '16.54%' has the highest value of ET in the group '150.242'.
But, this transaction's value is too small to be viewed as a bottleneck factor.

'Bot - Entry msg' transaction with weight '7.29%' has the lowest value of ET in the group '66.231'.
This means that this transaction can be viewed as the most lightweight transaction in the group.

The special notice can be given to the '226.85%' of the dispersion between maximum and minimum ET values.
Which indicates a lack of homogeneity in the transaction group.

'Client - Text msg 1' transaction with weight '9.57%' has the highest value of difference in the group '+16.246%'.
This means that this transaction can be viewed as a target for improvement.

'Client - CSAT answer' transaction with weight '9.92%' has the lowest value of difference in the group '-39.135%'.

The special notice can be given to the absolute value '55.38%' of dispersion between maximum and minimum difference values.
Such dispersion suggests that transaction performance improvements and deteriorations, that were made directly or indirectly, did make related system part(s) more unstable which require further investigation.

'Agent - Welcome msg' transaction with weight '25.36%' has the highest value of ET in the group '685.4'.
This means that this transaction can be viewed as a bottleneck factor.

'Agent - Reply msg 5' transaction with weight '9.56%' has the lowest value of ET in the group '258.48'.
This means that this transaction can be viewed as the most lightweight transaction in the group.

The special notice can be given to the '265.17%' of the dispersion between maximum and minimum ET values.
Which indicates a lack of homogeneity in the transaction group.

'Agent - Welcome msg' transaction with weight '25.36%' has the highest value of difference in the group '+164.361%'.
This means that this transaction can be viewed as a target for improvement.

'Agent - Reply msg 4' transaction with weight '15.28%' has the lowest value of difference in the group '-21.357%'.

The special notice can be given to the absolute value '185.72%' of dispersion between maximum and minimum difference values.
Such dispersion suggests that transaction performance improvements and deteriorations, that were made directly or indirectly, did make related system part(s) more unstable which require further investigation.

'Bot - Agent request msg' transaction with weight '21.37%' has the highest value of ET in the group '136.742'.
But, this transaction's value is too small to be viewed as a bottleneck factor.

'Client - Text msg 5' transaction with weight '8.73%' has the lowest value of ET in the group '55.856'.
This means that this transaction can be viewed as the most lightweight transaction in the group.

The special notice can be given to the '244.81%' of the dispersion between maximum and minimum ET values.
Which indicates a lack of homogeneity in the transaction group.

'Client - Text msg 2' transaction with weight '11.29%' has the highest value of difference in the group '+27.441%'.
This means that this transaction can be viewed as a target for improvement.

'Client - CSAT answer' transaction with weight '9.42%' has the lowest value of difference in the group '-9.6%'.

The special notice can be given to the absolute value '37.04%' of dispersion between maximum and minimum difference values.
Such dispersion suggests that transaction performance improvements and deteriorations, that were made directly or indirectly, did make related system part(s) more unstable which require further investigation.

'Bot - Agent request msg' transaction with weight '16.54%' has the highest value of ET in the group '150.242'.
This means that this transaction can be viewed as a bottleneck factor.

'Bot - Entry msg' transaction with weight '7.29%' has the lowest value of ET in the group with value '66.231'.
This means that this transaction can be viewed as the least lightweight in the group.

The special notice can be given to the '226.85%' of the dispersion between maximum and minimum ET values.
Which indicates a lack of homogeneity in the transaction group.

'Client - Text msg 1' transaction with weight '9.57%' has the highest value of difference in the group '+16.246%'.
This means that this transaction can be viewed as a target for improvement.

'Client - CSAT answer' transaction with weight '9.92%' has the lowest value of difference in the group '-39.135%'.

The special notice can be given to the absolute value '55.381 percentage points' of dispersion between maximum and minimum difference values.
Such dispersion suggests that transaction performance changes may require further investigation.

-----------------------------------

'Bot - Agent request msg' transaction with weight '16.54%' has the highest value of ET in the group '150.242'.
But, this transaction's value is too small to be viewed as a bottleneck factor.

'Bot - Entry msg' transaction with weight '7.29%' has the lowest value of ET in the group '66.231'.
This means that this transaction can be viewed as the most lightweight transaction in the group.

The special notice can be given to the '226.85%' of the dispersion between maximum and minimum ET values.
Which indicates a lack of homogeneity in the transaction group.

'Client - Text msg 1' transaction with weight '9.57%' has the highest value of difference in the group '+16.246%'.
This means that this transaction can be viewed as a target for improvement.

'Client - CSAT answer' transaction with weight '9.92%' has the lowest value of difference in the group '-64.299%'.

The special notice can be given to the absolute value '80.55%' of dispersion between maximum and minimum difference values.
Such dispersion suggests that transaction performance improvements and deteriorations, that were made directly or indirectly, did make related system part(s) more unstable which require further investigation.

'Bot - Agent request msg' transaction with weight '16.09%' has the highest value of ET in the group '177.881'.
But, this transaction's value is too small to be viewed as a bottleneck factor.

'Bot - Entry msg' transaction with weight '6.92%' has the lowest value of ET in the group '76.445'.
This means that this transaction can be viewed as the most lightweight transaction in the group.

The special notice can be given to the '232.69%' of the dispersion between maximum and minimum ET values.
Which indicates a lack of homogeneity in the transaction group.

'Bot - Language menu msg' transaction with weight '11.57%' has the highest value of difference in the group '+32.711%'.
This means that this transaction can be viewed as a target for improvement.

'Client - CSAT answer' transaction with weight '13.04%' has the lowest value of difference in the group '-38.693%'.

The special notice can be given to the absolute value '71.40%' of dispersion between maximum and minimum difference values.
Such dispersion suggests that transaction performance improvements and deteriorations, that were made directly or indirectly, did make related system part(s) more unstable which require further investigation.

'Bot - Agent request msg' transaction with weight '6.31%' has the highest value of requests per time bucket in the group - '2.795'.
Thus, this transaction can be viewed as the most used one in at least one time bucket.

'/api/v1/accounts/(accountId)/conversations/(conv_id)' transaction with weight '1.94%' has the lowest value of requests per time bucket in the group - '0.86'.
Thus, this transaction can be viewed as the least used one at least in one time bucket.

'Bot - Entry msg' transaction with weight '6.28%' has the highest value of difference in the group '-13.79%'.
Where negative number shows degradation in the whole group.

'Client - Text msg 3' transaction with weight '1.94%' has the lowest value of difference in the group '-24.095%'.
This transaction can be viewed as a target for improvement.

Improvements or deteriorations in throughput of the respective transactions is result of these transactions decrease or increase of ET timings.

'Agent - Reply msg 1' transaction with weight '16.67%' has the highest value of requests per time bucket in the group - '0.86'.
Thus, this transaction can be viewed as the most used one in at least one time bucket.

'Agent - Reply msg 1' transaction with weight '16.67%' has the lowest value of requests per time bucket in the group - '0.86'.
Thus, this transaction can be viewed as the least used one at least in one time bucket.

'Agent - Reply msg 1' transaction with weight '16.67%' has the highest value of difference in the group '-21.818%'.
This transaction can be viewed as a target for improvement.

'Agent - Reply msg 1' transaction with weight '16.67%' has the lowest value of difference in the group '-21.818%'.
This transaction can be viewed as a target for improvement.

Improvements or deteriorations in throughput of the respective transactions is result of these transactions decrease or increase of ET timings.

No charts available.

No transaction errors were observed in both builds.

The unequal number of data points (1 vs 0) in both builds suggests that some transaction(s) started earlier or finished later than aggregation bucket. This may require further investigation.

'/api/v1/accounts/{accountId}/agents' transaction zero spread values in both builds suggests that it was executed only once per aggreagation bucket.

'/app/login' transaction zero spread values in both builds suggests that it was executed only once per aggreagation bucket.

'/auth/sign_in' transaction zero spread values in both builds suggests that it was executed only once per aggreagation bucket.

'/auth/validate_token' transaction zero spread values in both builds suggests that it was executed only once per aggreagation bucket.

'host/' transaction zero spread values in both builds suggests that it was executed only once per aggreagation bucket.

'/api/v1/profile/availability' transaction with weight '16.89%' has the highest value of ET Spread in the group '30.782'.
This spread is '3078.20%' of the transaction's variability.
And, this can be viewed as a volatility bottleneck factor that shows instability in the corresponding code block.

'/brand-assets/logo-small.png' transaction with weight '5.52%' has the lowest value of ET Spread in the group with value '10.065'.
This means that this transaction can be viewed as the least volatile in the group.

The special notice can be given to the value '20.72' (or '305.83%') of dispersion between maximum and minimum ET Spread values.
It indicates a lack of homogeneity in the transaction group.

'/api/v1/accounts/{accountId}/notification_settings/global' transaction with weight '12.23%' has the highest value of difference in the group '+56.63%'.
This means that this transaction can be viewed as a target for improvement.

'/api/v1/accounts/{accountId}/' transaction with weight '14.54%' has the lowest value of difference in the group '+7.535%'.
The '+' character indicates an increase in Spread, which is a negative factor. This increase was observed in transaction with the lowest difference within the transaction group, suggesting a negative overall impact on the group.

The special notice can be given to the absolute value '49.10%' of dispersion between maximum and minimum difference values.
Such dispersion suggests that transaction performance improvements and deteriorations, that were made directly or indirectly, did make related system part(s) more unstable which require further investigation.

'toggle_status resolved' transaction with weight '33.97%' has the highest value of ET Spread in the group '246.833'.
This spread is '24683.30%' of the transaction's variability.
And, this can be viewed as a volatility bottleneck factor that shows instability in the corresponding code block.

'/api/v1/accounts/(accountId)/conversations/(conv_id)' transaction with weight '3.03%' has the lowest value of ET Spread in the group with value '21.989'.
This means that this transaction can be viewed as the least volatile in the group.

The special notice can be given to the value '224.84' (or '1122.53%') of dispersion between maximum and minimum ET Spread values.
It indicates a lack of homogeneity in the transaction group.

'toggle_status resolved' transaction with weight '33.97%' has the highest value of difference in the group '+351.363%'.
This means that this transaction can be viewed as a target for improvement.

'update_last_seen' transaction with weight '3.45%' has the lowest value of difference in the group '-7.286%'.

The special notice can be given to the absolute value '358.65%' of dispersion between maximum and minimum difference values.
Such dispersion suggests that transaction performance improvements and deteriorations, that were made directly or indirectly, did make related system part(s) more unstable which require further investigation.

'toggle_status resolved' transaction with weight '42.51%' has the highest value of ET Spread in the group '405.09'.
This spread is '40509.00%' of the transaction's variability.
And, this can be viewed as a volatility bottleneck factor that shows instability in the corresponding code block.

'/api/v1/accounts/{accountId}/inbox_members/{inboxId}' transaction with weight '2.32%' has the lowest value of ET Spread in the group with value '22.133'.
This means that this transaction can be viewed as the least volatile in the group.

The special notice can be given to the value '382.96' (or '1830.25%') of dispersion between maximum and minimum ET Spread values.
It indicates a lack of homogeneity in the transaction group.

'/api/v1/accounts/{accountId}/conversations/{conv_id}/labels' transaction with weight '6.98%' has the highest value of difference in the group '+396.23%'.
This means that this transaction can be viewed as a target for improvement.

'update_last_seen' transaction with weight '4.09%' has the lowest value of difference in the group '-57.683%'.

The special notice can be given to the absolute value '453.91%' of dispersion between maximum and minimum difference values.
Such dispersion suggests that transaction performance improvements and deteriorations, that were made directly or indirectly, did make related system part(s) more unstable which require further investigation.

'Agent - Reply msg 1' transaction with weight '27.82%' has the highest value of ET Spread in the group '93.657'.
This spread is '9365.70%' of the transaction's variability.
And, this can be viewed as a volatility bottleneck factor that shows instability in the corresponding code block.

'Agent - Reply msg 4' transaction with weight '9.21%' has the lowest value of ET Spread in the group with value '31.018'.
This means that this transaction can be viewed as the least volatile in the group.

The special notice can be given to the value '62.64' (or '301.94%') of dispersion between maximum and minimum ET Spread values.
It indicates a lack of homogeneity in the transaction group.

'Agent - Welcome msg' transaction with weight '21.02%' has the highest value of difference in the group '+331.942%'.
This means that this transaction can be viewed as a target for improvement.

'Agent - Reply msg 4' transaction with weight '9.21%' has the lowest value of difference in the group '-19.26%'.

The special notice can be given to the absolute value '351.20%' of dispersion between maximum and minimum difference values.
Such dispersion suggests that transaction performance improvements and deteriorations, that were made directly or indirectly, did make related system part(s) more unstable which require further investigation.

'Agent - Reply msg 2' transaction with weight '21.43%' has the highest value of ET Spread in the group '147.287'.
This spread is '14728.70%' of the transaction's variability.
And, this can be viewed as a volatility bottleneck factor that shows instability in the corresponding code block.

'Agent - Reply msg 5' transaction with weight '7.94%' has the lowest value of ET Spread in the group with value '54.565'.
This means that this transaction can be viewed as the least volatile in the group.

The special notice can be given to the value '92.72' (or '269.93%') of dispersion between maximum and minimum ET Spread values.
It indicates a lack of homogeneity in the transaction group.

'Agent - Welcome msg' transaction with weight '21.35%' has the highest value of difference in the group '+195.721%'.
This means that this transaction can be viewed as a target for improvement.

'Agent - Reply msg 5' transaction with weight '7.94%' has the lowest value of difference in the group '+14.869%'.
The '+' character indicates an increase in Spread, which is a negative factor. This increase was observed in transaction with the lowest difference within the transaction group, suggesting a negative overall impact on the group.

The special notice can be given to the absolute value '180.85%' of dispersion between maximum and minimum difference values.
Such dispersion suggests that transaction performance improvements and deteriorations, that were made directly or indirectly, did make related system part(s) more unstable which require further investigation.

'Agent - Welcome msg' transaction with weight '24.15%' has the highest value of ET Spread in the group '169.893'.
This spread is '16989.30%' of the transaction's variability.
And, this can be viewed as a volatility bottleneck factor that shows instability in the corresponding code block.

'Agent - Reply msg 5' transaction with weight '6.50%' has the lowest value of ET Spread in the group with value '45.716'.
This means that this transaction can be viewed as the least volatile in the group.

The special notice can be given to the value '124.18' (or '371.63%') of dispersion between maximum and minimum ET Spread values.
It indicates a lack of homogeneity in the transaction group.

'Agent - Welcome msg' transaction with weight '24.15%' has the highest value of difference in the group '+390.751%'.
This means that this transaction can be viewed as a target for improvement.

'Agent - Reply msg 3' transaction with weight '9.32%' has the lowest value of difference in the group '+8.958%'.
The '+' character indicates an increase in Spread, which is a negative factor. This increase was observed in transaction with the lowest difference within the transaction group, suggesting a negative overall impact on the group.

The special notice can be given to the absolute value '381.79%' of dispersion between maximum and minimum difference values.
Such dispersion suggests that transaction performance improvements and deteriorations, that were made directly or indirectly, did make related system part(s) more unstable which require further investigation.

'Bot - Agent request msg' transaction with weight '26.35%' has the highest value of ET Spread in the group '49.246'.
This spread is '4924.60%' of the transaction's variability.
And, this can be viewed as a volatility bottleneck factor that shows instability in the corresponding code block.

'Client - Text msg 1' transaction with weight '6.21%' has the lowest value of ET Spread in the group with value '11.614'.
This means that this transaction can be viewed as the least volatile in the group.

The special notice can be given to the value '37.63' (or '424.02%') of dispersion between maximum and minimum ET Spread values.
It indicates a lack of homogeneity in the transaction group.

'Client - Text msg 2' transaction with weight '14.20%' has the highest value of difference in the group '+217.268%'.
This means that this transaction can be viewed as a target for improvement.

'Client - Text msg 4' transaction with weight '7.60%' has the lowest value of difference in the group '-10.84%'.

The special notice can be given to the absolute value '228.11%' of dispersion between maximum and minimum difference values.
Such dispersion suggests that transaction performance improvements and deteriorations, that were made directly or indirectly, did make related system part(s) more unstable which require further investigation.

'Bot - Agent request msg' transaction with weight '18.45%' has the highest value of ET Spread in the group '58.296'.
This spread is '5829.60%' of the transaction's variability.
And, this can be viewed as a volatility bottleneck factor that shows instability in the corresponding code block.

'Bot - Language menu msg' transaction with weight '8.09%' has the lowest value of ET Spread in the group with value '25.57'.
This means that this transaction can be viewed as the least volatile in the group.

The special notice can be given to the value '32.73' (or '227.99%') of dispersion between maximum and minimum ET Spread values.
It indicates a lack of homogeneity in the transaction group.

'Bot - Entry msg' transaction with weight '8.13%' has the highest value of difference in the group '+166.878%'.
This means that this transaction can be viewed as a target for improvement.

'Client - CSAT answer' transaction with weight '8.52%' has the lowest value of difference in the group '-16.956%'.

The special notice can be given to the absolute value '183.83%' of dispersion between maximum and minimum difference values.
Such dispersion suggests that transaction performance improvements and deteriorations, that were made directly or indirectly, did make related system part(s) more unstable which require further investigation.

'Bot - Agent request msg' transaction with weight '19.33%' has the highest value of ET Spread in the group '59.883'.
This spread is '5988.30%' of the transaction's variability.
And, this can be viewed as a volatility bottleneck factor that shows instability in the corresponding code block.

'Client - Text msg 1' transaction with weight '5.62%' has the lowest value of ET Spread in the group with value '17.419'.
This means that this transaction can be viewed as the least volatile in the group.

The special notice can be given to the value '42.46' (or '343.78%') of dispersion between maximum and minimum ET Spread values.
It indicates a lack of homogeneity in the transaction group.

'Bot - Language menu msg' transaction with weight '10.23%' has the highest value of difference in the group '+66.895%'.
This means that this transaction can be viewed as a target for improvement.

'Client - CSAT answer' transaction with weight '10.56%' has the lowest value of difference in the group '-35.863%'.

The special notice can be given to the absolute value '102.76%' of dispersion between maximum and minimum difference values.
Such dispersion suggests that transaction performance improvements and deteriorations, that were made directly or indirectly, did make related system part(s) more unstable which require further investigation.

'Bot - Entry msg' transaction with weight '7.99%' has the highest value of requests per time bucket Spread in the group - '1.109'.
This spread is '110.90%' of the transaction's variability.
And, this can be viewed as a volatility bottleneck factor that shows instability in the corresponding code block.

'/api/v1/accounts/{accountId}/custom_filters?filter_type=conversation' transaction with weight '1.14%' has the lowest value of requests per time bucket Spread in the group with value '0.159'.
This transaction can be viewed as the least volatile in the group.

The special notice can be given to the value '0.949' (or '85.573%') of dispersion between maximum and minimum requests per time bucket Spread values.
It indicates a lack of homogeneity in the transaction group.

'/api/v1/accounts/{accountId}/conversations?status=open&assignee_type=me&page=1' transaction with weight '3.25%' has the highest value of difference in the group - '+152.514%'.
This transaction can be viewed as a target for improvement.

'Agent - Reply msg 5' transaction with weight '1.16%' has the lowest value of difference in the group - '-44.863%'.

The special notice can be given to the absolute value '197.38%' of dispersion between maximum and minimum difference values.
Such dispersion suggests that transaction performance improvements and deteriorations, that were made directly or indirectly, did make related system part(s) more unstable which require further investigation.

'Agent - Reply msg 4' transaction with weight '21.89%' has the highest value of requests per time bucket Spread in the group - '0.336'.
This can be viewed as a volatility bottleneck factor that shows instability in the corresponding code block.

'Agent - Reply msg 5' transaction with weight '10.49%' has the lowest value of requests per time bucket Spread in the group - '0.161'.
This transaction can be viewed as the least volatile in the group.

The special notice can be given to the value '0.175' (or '52.083%') of dispersion between maximum and minimum requests per time bucket Spread values.
It indicates a lack of homogeneity in the group.

'Agent - Reply msg 4' transaction with weight '21.89%' has the highest value of difference in the group - '+119.608%'.
This transaction can be viewed as a target for improvement.

'Agent - Reply msg 5' transaction with weight '10.49%' has the lowest value of difference in the group - '-44.863%'.

The special notice can be given to the absolute value '164.47%' of dispersion between maximum and minimum difference values.
Such dispersion suggests that transaction performance improvements and deteriorations, that were made directly or indirectly, did make related system part(s) more unstable which require further investigation.